The Central Government has told the Supreme Court that marital rape is more of a "social issue than a legal one" as it submitted its affidavit against criminalisation. In the legal document submitted before the top courtvipph, the Centre has stated that there are "suitably designed punitive measures" to tackle the issue of marital rape.
Despite its move against the criminalisation of marital rape, the government noted that marriage does not end the concept of consent of a woman.
However, Centre added that the consequences of such a violation within marriage is different from violation outside marriage.
Behind Marital Rape, A Social Stigma That Prevents IncriminationAs per the government, applying penal provisions of rape within a marriage would be "excessively harsh" and could have serious "social-legal implications" on the institution of marriage.
Centre submits that "while exercising such judicial review on such subjects (marital rape), it is to be appreciated that the present question is not only a constitutional question, but essentially a social question on which the Parliament, after being apprised and being aware of all sides of the opinion on the present issue, has taken a position."
New Criminal Laws Face Scrutiny Over Marital Rape ExemptionCentre files affidavit and informs Supreme Court that matters relating to marital rape will have very far-reaching socio-legal implications in the country and therefore, needs a comprehensive approach rather than a strictly legal approach.Centre submits that "while exercising… pic.twitter.com/JluWUhj0V0
— ANI (@ANI) October 3, 2024Adding to this, the government told the Supreme Court added that the Parliament has decided to retain Exception 2 to Section 375 of IPC in 2013, which exempts husbands from being prosecuted for rape if the victim is their wife.
Even in under the new law, Exception 2 to Section 63 (rape) says that "sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under eighteen years of age, is not rape".
"In the fast-growing and ever-changing social and family structure, misuse of the amended provisions can also not be ruled out, as it would be difficult and challenging for a person to prove whether consent was there or not," Centre told SC.
"Furthermore, it is submitted that striking down the exception 2 of section 375 of IPC on the ground of its constitutional validity will have a far-reaching effect on the institution of marriage if sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his own wife is made punishable as 'rape'," the Centre added further.
Sex In Marriage: Criminalising Marital Rape Will Save Institution Of MarriageThe affidavit further added that there were alternative legal provisions such as Sections 354, 354A, 354B, and 498A of the IPCvipph, as well as the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which provides "adequate remedies" for violations of consent within a marriage.
MANILA, Philippines Severalcourts in Bicol Region have suspended work from October 28 to 31 for the well-being of its personnel and judges following last weeks ...
MANILA, Philippines At least 145 people have reportedly died due to the effects of Severe Tropical Storm Kristine and Typhoon Leon, according to the National Di...
SINGAPORE: Singtel said a lack of talent trained in artificial intelligence (AI) could be one of Singapore's most consequential bottlenecks in its digital journ...
SINGAPORE: Former NTUC Income CEO Tan Suee Chieh on Monday (Oct 14) welcomed the government's decision to intervene and stop a proposed deal between Income Insu...
SINGAPORE: Leader of the Opposition Pritam Singh went on trial on Monday (Oct 14) in a closely watched caseibetph, contesting two charges for essentially lying ...
Powered by CODVIP|VIP Slots Login|Vip Slots Casino|Royal VIP Casino @2013-2022 RSS地图 HTML地图